This is what it looks like:
Wait, I'm confused... what is Matte Satin??? Is it matte or is it satin? As far as I know the two don't make a good hybrid.
I also don't like the packaging. The clear top is thin, and this almost reminds me of Revlon's MSFs (Sorry, I cant think of their official names atm!) except its not square.
It is $24 for .17 ounces. Way overpriced imo but what can you do if you don't look at the receipts until six months later.
Here is how it turns out:
It is a pretty, shimmery, light pink. It's a finely milled, lightweight product with decent pigmentation. It has a similar feel as MAC's mineralized blushes.
I feel this shade is very similar to a highlighter, which I tend to stay away from because of the pore accentuation problems I experience with those. It does create a nice pinky glow, with a bit of a luminizing effect.
This is how it turned out on my cheek:
Hideous. Even for a doll cheek look I would have preferred anything with less shimmer. This blush unfortunately is not for me, but I don't think it's a particularly bad product. I do, however, feel they should rethink the name.
i luv the colour~~~so pretty~~~~
ReplyDeleteJessy
I think the color is really pretty but yeah, I'm not diggin the shimmer. That's something I steer away from in a blush too.
ReplyDelete